Thursday, October 19, 2006

Tag, you're gone!

(deep SIGH)

First they took away Dodgeball, saying it was too violent. Then a couple of kids fell off the see-saw and monkey bars, so away they went. Soon after that, all the tall metal slides were replaced by short plastic corkscrew slides that don't allow you to pick up any speed at all. Before long somebody also said that even swings were too dangerous for playground play. Now just when you thought parents and schools couldn't get any more ridiculous and pussified than they already are, you know what some school board in Attleboro, Massachusetts decided this week? Apparently the game of Tag is no longer an appropriate game. Tag! I mean... TAG for Christ's sake! Claiming "Recess is a time when accidents happen," the Willlette Elementary School has now deemed one of the most basic, elemental and pure games of childhood to be too rough and dangerous for kids to play. What's more amazing is that there's nothing amazing about this particular decision. Apparently schools all over the country have been taking similar measures for years. In 2002 a Santa Monica school banned the game saying that it "creates self esteem issues among slower and weaker children."

I just don't even know what to say about this decision that isn't already self-evident to anybody who grew up in any previous generation, though I think George Carlin definitely said it best a few years ago when he said: "Grownups are taking all the fun out of being a kid just to save a few thousand lives. It's pathetic."

I'll skip all the remarks and comments of how stupid and moronic this decision and other decisions like it are (I'm sure all of you reading have a least a dozen comments of your own that you could insert here... and if you don't, well then you're a hopeless case anyway who should never have kids of your own) and instead skip right ahead to the big picture and its long term implications.

Every generation fears the generation that comes after it. Our grandparents were horrified by the rock-n-roll that our parents grew up listening to. Our parents were horrified by the brain-numbing MTV programming we watched like Beavis & Butthead and Singled Out. It's expected. You think your parents are prudes and you wish your kids would be into the wholesome things you used to be into. But now that my generation is stepping into the roles of parenthood a new and disturbing trend is happening. We're actually saying that all the things we loved about being a kid are no longer good and valid forms of entertainment. Instead, we claim they're damaging to the body and psyche of our frail little children. That's what we're saying, but the more I think about it, the more I think it goes deeper. Parents aren't really vilifying things that are dangerous. What they're really trying to forbid is any activity that kids can participate in without the direct supervision of a group of adults.

I never made that leap of logic until I read a short article that talked about how soccer is now the number one sport engaged in by the youth of America. And what immediately occurred to me was that the article or the study or whatever it was had left out one key word from that declaration. What it should have said was that soccer was the number one organized sport in America. Whenever you see American kids playing soccer, it's almost without exception a structured, organized event with official teams, coaches, referees, and soccer moms from the boosters club selling refreshments and car magnets in the shape of soccer balls. You almost never see a group of four or ten unsupervised kids trying to kick a soccer ball through a makeshift goal they set up using a couple backpacks. That's what kids in every other country in the world do, but not in America. No, in America I would stake my life on saying the most popular sport that kids engage in, irrespective of any kind of supervision, is basketball. Kids don't need an organized group of parents in order to play basketball. As long as they have a ball, a net and a hard surface they'll shoot hoops for hours just for the sheer joy of playing. But since there's no way to poll every pickup game on every cracked asphalt court in the country, soccer is the sport that wins the most popular title.

And that suits the parents of my generation just fine. For some reason, parents my age just can't stand the idea that their kids could be having any kind of fun in any activity that they didn't personally orchestrate and supervise. Give kids the opportunity and a rubber ball or three and they'll organize their own game of dodgeball. They'll monitor themselves, coach themselves and referee themselves. Give them the chance and they'll run around for an hour, chasing each other and tagging each other in the most unstructured game ever created. There's no need for parents. There's no need to keep score. There's no need to even determine a winner. You just play the game until you get sick of it, at which point you move on to something else. I'm not sure why, but games like that, games that we ourselves used to play, freak out the parents of my generation. It's inconceivable to them that their kids would do anything without their direct influence. And that's why things like playground equipment and unstructured games like tag and dodgeball are going away. "Safety" and "self-esteem" are just easy scapegoats for the real truth, which is today's parents are scared shitless that their kids... might not need them.

I don't know where all this insecurity originated and why it seems to be unique to the parents of my generation. Is it that we wish our own parents would have spent more time playing with us that we feel compelled to make sure our kids never spend a joyful minute outside our presence? Is it the reports of kids being stolen out of their own yards are making us too scared to let our kids leave our personal guardianship for any reason whatsoever? What is it that makes games like soccer, where literally dozens of kids can be supervised all at once, more preferable to games like tag where kids can supervise themselves? Why on earth is our generation unique in vilifying ourselves by vilifying the things we used to love? And where will it end? How much of our children's lives will we attempt to structuralize with no thought given to what we're depriving them of?

Labels: , , ,

4 Comments:

At October 19, 2006 10:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not sure if they're afraid for their kids or afraid OF them. These little wrapped in cotton, get everything they want kids are becoming holy terrors. Someone please remind parents that their job is to raise a good adult, not to give their children the best that money can buy. We didn’t have all these safety measures when we were little and gee, it's amazing we're even alive with the “dangerous" things we did- wearing shorts on metal slides, staying out until dark without a cell phone, riding a bike without being padded head to toe. Every scar we have, every injury taught us a lesson and made us tougher. How are these kids going to survive as adults without someone there to hold their hand and protect them?

It doesn’t matter how much you try to protect kids today, or how much you buy them. No one can provide them what we had in the 70’s and 80’s- the freedom to just be a kid, not worrying about school shootings, terrorism and pre-teen sex.

Sandra

 
At October 21, 2006 8:15 AM, Blogger Brian said...

And what I wonder is how do WE the normal thinking parents of the world combat this trend. How can we see to it that our kids aren't hindered by some whiny little maggot who bans everything that is remotely fun simply because somebody MIGHT get hurt? It's supposed to be that we fear for the future because of what our kids our doing. Now I weep for the future because of what the PARENTS are doing.

 
At October 22, 2006 9:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This makes me so MAD! In college, I actually wrote a paper about the disappearance of recess, which also makes me mad. Most Chicago Public Schools don't have recess at all, let alone allow TAG. Imagine working in a 2nd grade class with 32 kids (20 of them boys) and keeping them cooped up at their desks (no gym except for once a week, no recess) all day. There's no way on earth that's a good thing.

Tag--I played this for hours. I'm sure it was one of the best forms of exercise I got. Self esteem? You have got to be kidding. Self-esteem and kids is a whole other tirade. For one thing, self-esteem actually has to be based on something: you have to know you're competent in order to be proud of it. Part of growing up is figuring out what things you are good at and what things you aren't. Not that I want kids to feel bad about themselves--but I don't think kids are actually going to feel great about themselves if they are never allowed to do anything.

Aargh. People are ridiculous.

Sam

 
At October 25, 2006 12:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have an example of kids being brought up with no self-esteem or whatever it is that makes them do stupid things like a school shooting. Today it was revealed that a student at my nephew's school had a hit list of 5 people that he was planning to take out today. My nephew was on that list. Now, my nephew is a horrible student but he's a great person who is trying to finish his senior year while also working for 3 fire departments (he's 18). And here's the kicker- this sniveling little brat is probably going to get off scot-free because the girl who turned him in didn't print out the IM session where he made this threat to her. Now I would like to know how outlawing tag is going to keep kids from being the monsters that some of them are becoming.

Sandra

 

Post a Comment

<< Home